(TCP PROJECT EXAMPLE)
I. PROJECT SUMMARY(Brief description of the project expectations and outcomes.)
II. BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATIONThe agricultural sector is of major importance to the economy of Country XXX, both in terms of foreign exchange generation and its contribution to employment. Over the past few years, this sector contributed approximately 30 percent of GDP, compared with 11 percent for mining and quarrying, the second most important productive sector, and over 50 percent of the country's export earnings. In addition, more than 70 percent of the country's labour force is employed in agriculture and related activities. The economic liberalization policies implemented from the late 1980s gave impetus to agricultural activities resulting in significant increases in output and productivity. This sector has exhibited a pattern of sustained growth from 199- to 199-. Traditionally, agricultural production has been dominated by the two main crops, sugar and rice, with other agriculture (non-traditional crops and livestock) being of secondary importance. Together, these two products contributed over 50 percent of export earnings. However, over the years, both sugar and rice have benefited from preferential trading arrangements in the export market and the uncertainty surrounding the future of these arrangements makes it imperative that XXX simultaneously improves the marketing of traditional exports, and increases the marketability of non-traditional crops and livestock. In an effort to realize the objective of increasing the marketability of non-traditional exports the Ministry of Agriculture (MOA) was restructured in 19--, as part of the Government's National Development Strategy, to increase the income and foreign exchange generating capacity of the non-traditional agricultural sub-sector. MOA identified the dairy sector as one of its key potential areas and immediately set up a small but dedicated National Dairy Development Programme (NDDP) in 19--. The livestock sub-sector's contribution to total agricultural output is relatively small, varying between ss percent to zz percent during the period 19- to 19--, however, the sub-sector is extremely important as a source of animal protein to the population and income to rural farmers. Within the sub-sector, cattle production is an area of particular significance. Changes in the global market scenario that threaten many of the areas of traditional agriculture have caused increasing attention to be given to the development of this industry in XXX. Improvements in the dairy sector are priorities of the MOA and are regarded as having potential to significantly improve food security, generate income for the small and part-time farmers and also contribute to the reduction of rural poverty. It has been estimated that the national requirement for fluid milk is about 54 million litres. Domestic production accounts for about 50 percent of this requirement, with the deficit being made up by the importation of milk powder and UHT, evaporated and condensed milks. This additional burden on an already unfavourable external trade balance, and the slide of the currency serve to exacerbate the current crisis. Further, those most vulnerable to the negative effects of increasing the cost of milk and milk products are the low-income groups, pregnant and nursing women, and children under five years. Dietary deficiency has always been a major contributory factor to the increase in malnutrition among the latter. Milk production in the coastal regions of XXX accounts for approximately xx percent of the national production. Production in Region ggg accounts for about xx percent of national production. This region presently has the largest concentration of cattle in XXX, (approximately ...,000 heads) and is an area with great potential for the expansion of the cattle industry. It was in consideration of this potential that LDC (Livestock Development Company) established two collecting centres in the yyy and nnn areas in the late 1980s. Large quantities of milk were collected daily from these collecting centres by LDC's refrigerated tankers and taken to the capital for processing. However, this collection system deteriorated, and resulted in the complete cessation of operations towards the end of 19--. Several factors contributed to the closure of the collection centre. These included improper management practices, unreliability of electric supply, the increasing use of large quantities of cheaply imported 'food aid' milk powder, unattractive farm gate prices for milk and an increase in the cost of milk collection. Over the years, private milk collectors have attempted to fill the void created by the closure of LDC’s collection centres. In the peak season, milk collectors can collect about 4,000 litters of milk daily. The extent of their operation is however limited by the lack of refrigeration facilities, and poor milk collection and distribution systems. These are the major impediments to the development of the industry. Most of the milk collected is sold in the zzz area to private processors, retailers and consumers. The milk collected by the middlemen represents less than 10 percent of the daily milk production potential of Region DD. The lack of refrigeration/cooling facilities and appropriate transportation prevent milk from areas along the creeks from being collected. Farmers in these areas, aware of the marketing constraints, may milk only part of their herd once daily. Farmers are fully prepared to adopt improved technology that will result in increased production levels, once there is a visible and accessible market for their produce. Improvement of milk marketing opportunities constitutes the single most important stimulant of the development of the milk sub sector. This project seeks to address the issue of marketing by improving milk collection using the Lactoperoxidase system (LP-s) of milk preservation and through introducing innovative processing technologies for farmers in the zzz area. MOA and NDDP are currently lacking in the technical knowledge and capacity to catalyze improvements in this area and have therefore requested FAO Technical assistance. The Government feels that if FAO can provide limited inputs and technical assistance that this will significantly contribute to the breakthrough of the current stagnation in the dairy sector and lead to real and sustainable development of small-scale dairy processing in XXX. Further, in XXX, tuberculosis a zoonotic disease that is transmissible from animal to man is present in the cattle herds, but the exact levels are unknown. The consumption of raw milk, which is a common practice in XXX, is one means of transmission of this disease. The process of pasteurization destroys the tuberculosis organism and reduces or eliminates this possibility of transmission. Milk being collected and sold gives higher returns to collectors, which should be passed on to the farmers. A pilot pasteurization and processing plant owned and run by a farmers group will provide substantial increased returns to dairy farmers and thus boost rural food security, generate additional income and increase milk production and consumption of safe quality milk.
III. OBJECTIVES OF THE ASSISTANCEThe overall objective of the project is to facilitate market access for dairy products thereby stimulating farmers' productivity and creating the opportunity for improving the income and standard of living of small-scale farmers. The immediate objectives are:
IV. PROJECT OUTPUTS (RESULTS)
V. WORK PLANThe 20 months project period has been divided into three phases, namely: Phase 1 Diagnosis and Preparation (months 1 and 2) Concurrent visits of the FAO-AGAP Dairy Officer for two weeks and the Consultant in Dairy Technology and Plant Management for one month: to review the situation and assess the detailed requirements for establishing the low cost pilot milk pasteurization enterprise; to set up the project task force; and to prepare a detailed project work plan; organize the project awareness/inception workshop; recruit the National Consultant. Phase 2: Implementation (months 3 to 18) (See table below for details) ACTIVITY SCHEDULE
Phase 3: Replication of the Model (months 19 and 20) (See table below for details)
NDDP National Dairy Development Programme FAO Food and Agriculture Organization MMCFA XXX Cattle Farmers' Association GOX Government of .XXX.
VI. CAPACITY BUILDINGKey elements in the project include the organization of farmers into a cohesive group, provision of on-farm advisory services, processing and milk marketing operations leading to the commercial operation of a sustainable pilot dairy processing plant. Significant capacity building is therefore predominant throughout the project. At farm level training in improved hygienic milk production, preservation and transportation will be provided through training of trainers. Full training and advice will be provided from senior level in the Ministry and NDDP through to the MMCFA on the successful set up and commercial management of a low cost pasteurizing and packaging plant. The project will result in a core cadre of highly trained staff at all levels who can be used as resource persons by the MOA to implement the Dairy Development Strategy for smallholders, which is to be one of the key outputs of the final workshop.
VII. INPUTS TO BE PROVIDED BY FAOPersonnel
Supervisory Technical Services Technical Backstopping by officers from AGAP - 3 visits for a total of 7 weeks30 days (TOR in Annex 4III2). Official Travel Budgetary provision is made for in-country travel of project personnel. General Operating Expenses General operating expenses will be up to US$10,210 Materials and Supplies Materials and supplies for training up to US$10,000 Equipment Equipment for a small-scale processing unit, up to US$65,000 (see Annex 5IV2 for details). Direct Operating Cost Direct expenses at FAO headquarters connected with the implementation of the project, up to US$20,000. Training The total cost for training is up to US$37,000 for: Study Tour: one week practical course for 2 dairy plant staff members at a small-scale dairy abroad (BBB or CCC as the technology has not yet been introduced to other development regions) (US$15,000). In-Country Training (US$22,000):
VIII. REPORTINGThe consultants will prepare reports at the end of each mission giving their findings, conclusions and recommendations, as well as contributing to the final technical report which will represent a detailed manual for the installation and operation of a similar small milk processing units in the country. The National Coordinator will submit quarterly progress reports and will contribute to the final project report. The Technical Backstopping Officer from FAO Headquarters will have the prime responsibility for the finalizing the technical report and drafting the Terminal Report.
IX. GOVERNMENT COUNTERPART CONTRIBUTION AND SUPPORTING ARRANGEMENTSThe Government of XXX/NDDP will provide the following for the implementation of the project:
PROJECT BUDGET COVERING FAO INPUTS(in U.S. Dollars)
ANNEX 1TERMS OF REFERENCETCDC Consultant in Dairy Technology and Plant Management
Duration: two months in 2 visits of 1 month each Duty Station: ............... Qualifications: A graduate in dairy technology with a minimum of ten years experience in integrated dairy development projects covering the financial, economic and technical aspects. Under the technical supervision of the AGAP Dairy Officer and the operational supervision of the Regional FAO Office concerned, the consultant will work closely with the National Coordinator, the TCDC consultants and the MOA/NDDP counterparts in performing the following duties: First mission (1 month)
Second mission (1 month) In-service training of dairy personnel in the operation and maintenance of the equipment.
Annex 2TERMS OF REFERENCETCDC Consultant in Dairy EngineeringDuration: 0.5 months in 1 visit Duty Station: ............. Qualifications: The consultant shall have substantial experience in the installation and commission of the low cost in-pouch milk pasteurization system. Under the technical supervision of the AGAP Dairy Officer and the operational supervision of the Regional FAO Office concerned, the consultant will work closely with the National Coordinator, the TCDC consultants and the MOAL/NDDP counterparts in performing the following duties:
This mission should be timed to coincide with the second visit of the TCDC Consultant/Dairy Technology and Plant Management. Annex 3TERMS OF REFERENCENational Consultant Dairy Farmers' Organization and TrainingDuration: Six months in three missions of two months each Duty Station: ................. Qualifications: A graduate in animal science or dairy technology with at least 5 year's experience smallholder milk production and group formation. Under the technical supervision of the AGAP Dairy Officer and the operational supervision of the Regional FAO Office concerned, the consultant will work closely with the National Coordinator, the TCDC consultants and the MOA/NDDP counterparts in performing the following duties: First mission of two months
Second mission of two months
Third mission of two months
Annex 4TERMS OF REFERENCETechnical BackstoppingUnder the supervision of the Senior Dairy Officer, the Technical Backstopping Officer from FAO Headquarters will be responsible for the following activities:
First mission (3 weeks)
Second-mission (two weeks)
Third mission (two weeks)
ANNEX 3EQUIPMENT FOR THE SMALL-SCALE DAIRY PLANT
(This is a partial and provisional list and is subject to complete review by the TCDC consultant and AGAP backstopping officer in light of their findings during their first mission)
|